Social influence bias: a randomized experiment.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Our society is increasingly relying on the digitized, aggregated opinions of others to make decisions. We therefore designed and analyzed a large-scale randomized experiment on a social news aggregation Web site to investigate whether knowledge of such aggregates distorts decision-making. Prior ratings created significant bias in individual rating behavior, and positive and negative social influences created asymmetric herding effects. Whereas negative social influence inspired users to correct manipulated ratings, positive social influence increased the likelihood of positive ratings by 32% and created accumulating positive herding that increased final ratings by 25% on average. This positive herding was topic-dependent and affected by whether individuals were viewing the opinions of friends or enemies. A mixture of changing opinion and greater turnout under both manipulations together with a natural tendency to up-vote on the site combined to create the herding effects. Such findings will help interpret collective judgment accurately and avoid social influence bias in collective intelligence in the future.
منابع مشابه
Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment in an Online Music Social Network
Demonstrating compelling causal evidence of the existence and strength of peer to peer influence has become the holy grail of the modern research in online social networks. In these networks, it has been consistently demonstrated that user characteristics and behavior tend to cluster both in space and in time. There are two well known rival mechanisms that compete to be the explanation for this...
متن کاملAre Paid Subscriptions on Music Social Networks Contagious? A Randomized Field Experiment
Demonstrating compelling causal evidence of the existence and strength of peer to peer influence in online social networks has become the holy grail of the modern research in online social networks. While it has been consistently demonstrated that user characteristics and behavior tend to cluster inside social networks both in space and in time, there are several different mechanisms that can c...
متن کاملAuthor's response to reviews Title: Effects of social approval bias on self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption: A randomized controlled trial Authors:
متن کامل
Unpriming: the deactivation of thoughts through expression.
Unpriming is a decrease in the influence of primed knowledge following a behavior expressing that knowledge. The authors investigated strategies for unpriming the knowledge of an answer that is activated when people are asked to consider a simple question. Experiment 1 found that prior correct answering eliminated the bias people normally show toward correct responding when asked to answer yes-...
متن کاملAttentional biases in social anxiety: an investigation using the inattentional blindness paradigm.
One line of research has examined attentional bias as a potential maintenance factor in social anxiety using cognitive experiment paradigms. The present study sought to examine the utility of the inattentional blindness (IB) paradigm for assessing attentional bias in social anxiety. Unlike other existing paradigms such as the emotional Stroop or dot-probe tasks, the IB paradigm has the advantag...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Science
دوره 341 6146 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013